Appraisal of each alternative
Each option's return, measured the same way.
- Incremental cash flow
- NPV, IRR and payback
- Comparable assumptions across options
Finder analyzes investments and capital allocation alternatives: appraises each project, compares return and risk, measures the impact on the company's cash and debt, and organizes the information for management or the board.
Unlike a feasibility study of a single project, investment analysis looks at the whole portfolio: what to do first, what to defer and what not to do with the capital available.
When it makes sense
Which to prioritize, using the same criteria for all.
Acquisition, organic build or partnership, with return and risk compared.
The year's project portfolio reviewed before approval.
The path that delivers the most growth per dollar invested.
The effective cost of each way of having the asset.
Continue, adjust or stop a project that has changed course.
What you receive
Each option's return, measured the same way.
What could go wrong with each.
The effect on the whole, not just the project.
The order that makes sense for the capital available.
How each investment could be funded.
Information organized for those who approve.
Point of view
Almost every growing company has more projects than capital.
The analysis compares alternatives on the same basis and shows the opportunity cost of each choice: what the company gives up when it chooses one project over another.
What each alternative delivers, measured the same way.
What could go wrong, and what it would cost.
What fits the cash flow and borrowing capacity.
How we work
Which options are on the table and how they will be compared.
Return, risk and assumptions for each alternative.
The effect of each combination on cash and debt.
Prioritization, sequencing and decision materials.
Frequently asked questions
A feasibility study answers whether one project pays off. Investment analysis compares projects with each other and with the capital available, and considers their combined effect on the company's cash and debt.
With more than one metric. NPV shows how much value each project creates; IRR and the profitability index show efficiency per dollar invested. When capital is limited, the combination that creates the most value within the budget is usually better than simply picking the highest IRRs.
Compare the value created, the timing and the risk of each path. Acquisitions tend to be faster and more expensive, with integration risk; organic growth tends to be slower, with execution risk. The analysis puts both on the same basis and shows the impact of each on the company's cash.
Yes. How a project is financed changes the return to shareholders and the capacity to invest. Where incentive financing is available, it is included in the comparison together with our capital raising practice.
Contact
Tell us which alternatives are under review and which decision needs to be made. We will suggest the criteria, scope and timeline.
The first conversation is free of charge.